The ease with which humanity has, does, and could: other, essentialize, and deindividualize anything or anyone is disturbing when examined. When unexamined, however, it is even more disturbing, since it is when it is unexamined that it has freest reign. When we do not question why we hate a group of people, or why someone is our enemy; when we don’t question why we do what we do, or what we call things; when we don’t ask where the meat on our plate came from, or why we even eat meat; when we believe we are separate, better, and unique without a single doubt – that is when we are our most dangerous to each other and to all life on this planet.
Works Cited
DeMello, Margo. Animals and Society: An Introduction to Human-Animal Studies. New York:
Columbia University Press, 2012. Print.
Kroetz, Flávia Saldanha. “Post-Genocide Identity Politics in Rwanda and Bosnia and
Herzegovina and Their Compatibility with International Human Rights Law.” International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, vol. 23, no. 3, 2016, pp. 328–354. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/44631157. Accessed 13 Nov. 2020.
Johnson, Walter. The Broken Heart of America: St. Louis and the Violent History of the United
States. New York: Basic Books, 2020. Web. https://www.laphamsquarterly.org/roundtable/largest-human-zoo-world-history
Moore, Robert I. The Formation of a Persecuting Society: Authority and Deviance in Western
Europe 950-1250. Kindle Edition.
Tope, Daniel, et al. “Othering Obama: Racial Attitudes and Dubious Beliefs about the Nation's
First Black President.” Sociological Perspectives, vol. 57, no. 4, 2014, pp. 450–469. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/44290108. Accessed 14 Nov. 2020.
Bazterrica, Agustina M., and Sarah Moses. Tender is the Flesh: a novel. New York, NY: Scribner, an imprint of Simon & Schuster, Inc, 2020. Print.
Comments
Post a Comment